WebMar 23, 2024 · Oghad made an attempt to re-interpret the same with more clarity. • Oghad examining compatibility between 20(3), Sec 73 of Evidence Act and Sec 5 & 6 of the … WebFeb 20, 2024 · In this research paper, several doctrines of law such as right against self-incrimination and double jeopardy, right to silence, maintaining chain of custody of sample, free and informed consent,...
The State of Bombay vs Kathi Kalu Oghad and Others - LawFoyer
http://www.nlujodhpur.ac.in/downloads/lawreview/Final_Self%20Incrimination.pdf WebState of Bombay v/s Kathi Kalu Oghad and Others Criminal Appeal No. 146 of 1958 Decided On, 04 August 1961. At, Supreme ... The correctness of the decision of the Constitution Bench of this Court in the case of Mohamed Dastagir v. The State of Madras ([1960] 3 S.C.R. 116.) was questioned because it was said that it ran counter to the ... second toe overlaps great toe
Ritesh Sinha v. State of Uttar Pradesh - latestlaws.com
WebState of U.P.15Relying on Kathi Kalu Oghad & Ors., counsel submitted that taking of thumb impressions, impression of palm or foot or fingers or specimen writing or exposing a part of the body by an accused for the purpose of identification is not furnishing evidence in the larger sense because Constitution makers never intended to put obstacles … WebJun 25, 2010 · Kathi Kalu Oghad , AIR 1961 SC 1808 lays down the correct proposition of law and that the High Court of Delhi was incorrect in holding to the contrary. 5. Section 311-A of the Code has been introduced after decision of the Supreme Court in State Of Uttar Pradesh v. Ram Babu Misra., AIR 1980 SC 791. The Court therein held:- “7. WebDespite great scholarly emphasis on fundamental rights cases, and the recent emphasis on the Court’s assumption of executive functions, the decision in State of Bombay v Kathi … second toe pain tip