Section 11 of nclt
WebThe National Company Law Tribunal or NCLT is a quasi-judicial body in India adjudicating issues concerning companies in the country. It was formed on June 1, 2016, as per the provisions of the Companies Act 2013 (Section 408) by the Indian government. In this article, you can read a brief about the National Company Law Tribunal for IAS Exam. Web8 Oct 2024 · This section empowers the NCLT to pass any order that it deems fit if, in its opinion, the company’s affairs have been or are being conducted in a manner prejudicial or oppressive to any member or members or prejudicial to public interest or in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the company and it would unfairly prejudice a petitioning …
Section 11 of nclt
Did you know?
Web25 Apr 2024 · The Kolkata bench of NCLT in the case of Kishore and Company v. Sri Balaji Metallics (P) Ltd, a lso concurred with the rationale of Sai Kripa and reiterated that a Section 9 application must be filed by the sole proprietor itself for it to be maintainable. A similar view was taken by NCLT, Kolkata in the case of Impact Event Web14 hours ago · By Ajeeta Bhatia. Published: Friday, April 14, 2024, 18:11 [IST] The Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of Future Retail Ltd (FRL) has been given a 90-day …
http://www.nclt.gov.in/ Web21 Jul 2016 · The Tribunal may on sufficient cause being shown, exempt the parties from compliance with any requirement of these rules and may give such directions in matters …
Web6 Nov 2024 · The NCLAT further held that Rule 11 of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Rules, 2016 has not been adopted for the purpose of the Code and only Rules 20 and 26 have been adopted in absence of any specific inherent power and where there is no merit, the question of exercising inherent power does not arise. Web26 Jan 2024 · Context of the Law behind Section 12A and Regulation 30A. After the IBC and the relevant regulations were brought into effect in 2016, there were many practical and legal issues in the law’s implementation. ... in exercise of its inherent powers Under Rule 11 of the NCLT Rules, 2016, allow or disallow an application for withdrawal or ...
Web18 hours ago · The NCLT has granted Future Retail Ltd (FRL) an extension of 90 days for concluding the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of the company. ... As per …
Web12 Jul 2024 · The notification increased the threshold limit of default from 1 lakh rupees to 1 crore rupees for filing applications under Part II of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code,2016. Since then, there has been a plethora of cases before the NCLT benches dealing with the pecuniary jurisdiction arising from the payment default of the debtor pre and ... horst hubmerWeb7 Jul 2024 · Further, it was observed that Rule 11 of NCLAT Rules, 2016 provides that ‘Nothing in these rules shall be deemed to limit or otherwise affect the inherent powers of … psu honors optionWeb30 Jul 2024 · Section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985. Section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (LTA85) sets out a Landlord’s obligations to repair a property that is … horst hoyerWebNCLT, vide its order dated 23.10.2024 1n IB no. 908/ND/2024, is of the view that neither the present claim of the Financial Creditor can be termed to be a 'Financial Debt' ... 11. Sub-section (3) (b) of Section 7 mandates the financial creditor to furnish the name of an Interim Resolution Professional. In compliance thereof the applicant has ... horst hubichWeb14 Jul 2024 · Thereafter, the corporate debtor filed an Application before the NCLT under section 8 of the Arbitration Act with a prayer to refer the parties to arbitration for settling … horst htmc11Webapplication is filed under Section 60(5) of the Code read with Rule 11 of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 (Rules). The reliefs sought by the intervenors in IA … psu hotels on campusWebS No CP/CA No IA/MA No Section Name of Parties Name of counsel for Petitioner / Applicant Name of counsel for Respondent Name of IRP/ RP/ (Liquidator) Remarks ... Rule 11 of NCLT Rules 2016 B Mahalakshmi-Vs-S Padmanabhan & 7 Others Ramalingam & Associates - 129 CP/1097/2024 - Sec 241/242 of CA 2013 S P Velumani &1 Ors horst hufer