Cunningham v. laser golf corp. 222 f.3d 943
WebCunningham v. Laser Golf Corp., 222 F.3d 943, 55 USPQ2d 1842, 1844 (Fed. Cir. 2000). Opposer also sufficiently alleged likelihood of confusion under Trademark Act Section … WebMar 14, 2024 · See Cunningham v. Laser Golf Corp., 222 F.3d 943, 55 USPQ2d 1842, 1846 (Fed. Cir. 2000) (“Regarding descriptive terms, this court has noted that the ‘descriptive component of a mark may be given little weight in reaching a conclusion on the likelihood of confusion.’”) (quoting In re Nat’l Data Corp., 753 F.2d 1056, 224 USPQ 749, …
Cunningham v. laser golf corp. 222 f.3d 943
Did you know?
WebApr 30, 2024 · Cunningham v. Laser Golf Corp., 222 F.3d 943, 945 (Fed. Cir. 2000). The standing element in the cancellation context is distinct from Article III standing and is not jurisdictional. See id. Cancellation standing requires "that the party seeking cancellation believe that it is likely to be damaged by the registration." Id. WebSep 10, 2024 · Cunningham v. Laser Golf Corp., 222 F.3d 943, 947 (Fed. Cir. 2000) (finding similarity between LASER for golf clubs and golf balls and LASERSWING for golf practice devices, and noting that "the term ‘swing’ is both common and descriptive" and therefore "may be given little weight in reaching a conclusion on likelihood of confusion ...
WebGet United States v. Cunningham, 103 F.3d 553 (1996), United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. … WebAug 14, 2000 · Research the case of Cunningham v. Laser Golf Corporation, from the Federal Circuit, 08-15-2000. AnyLaw is the FREE and Friendly legal research service …
WebApr 6, 2024 · Laser Golf Corp., 222 F.3d 943, 945 (Fed. Cir. 2000). A plaintiff has standing if it “has a real commercial interest in its own marks and a reasonable basis for its belief that it would be ... Web`construing the allegations therein liberally, as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(f), to determine ` `whether it contains any allegations which, if proved, would entitle plaintiff to the relief sought. ` `See Cunningham v. Laser Golf Corp., 222 F.3d 943, 55 USPQ2d 1842 (Fed. Cir. 2000); Lipton ` `Indus., 670 F.2d 1024; TBMP § 503.02.
WebGray took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. Cunningham v. Cunningham, 99 N.E. 845 (N.Y. 1912), was a case heard by the New York Court of …
WebWisconsin Department of Transportation chow king restaurantWebOpinion for Tom Cunningham v. Laser Golf Corporation (Now Known as Belair Golf), 222 F.3d 943 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information. ... Laser Golf Corporation (Now Known as Belair Golf), 222 F.3d 943 (Fed. Cir. 2000) ... chow king restaurant philippinesWebMar 28, 2011 · Laser Golf Corp ., the T.T.A.B. used current and past commercial displays of the appliedfor mark to inform but not to restrict its analysis of potential displays. 222 F.3d 943 (Fed.Cir.2000). In Cunningham, this court canceled the junior mark LASERSWING for a golf practice device in light of the senior mark LASER for golf clubs and golf balls. chowking ready to cookWebCLA-0106 (ENG) Cunningham v. Laser Golf Corp., 222 F.3d 943, 55 USPQ 2d 1842, 1844 (Fed. Cir. 2000) Cunningham v. Laser Golf Corp. CLA-0108 (ENG) Palm Bay Imps v. Veuve Cliquot, Ponsardin Matson, 396 F3d 1369, 73 USPQ2d 1689 (Fed Cir 2005) Palm Bay Imps v. Veuve Cliquot chowking restaurant menuWebAug 15, 2000 · Case opinion for US Federal Circuit CUNNINGHAM v. LASER GOLF CORPORATION. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw. ... See Recot, Inc. v. M.C. … chowking riceWebMay 21, 1998 · About This Home. 943 Coleman St SW is a 1,130 square foot house on a 5,000 square foot lot with 3 bedrooms and 1 bathroom. This home is currently off market … chowking roxas blvdWebSee Cunningham v. Laser Golf Corp., 222 F.3d 943, 55 USPQ2d 1842, 1846 (Fed. Cir. 2000) (“Regardin g descriptive terms, this court has noted that the ‘descriptive … chowking roxas city contact number